Robot-assisted tubo-tubal reanastomosis after sterilization in 10 steps.

Five to 20% of women regret having a tubal ligation. These women are generally otherwise fertile and have a better chance of pregnancy than other patients experiencing infertility, whether by in vitro fertilization or after tubal surgery. Historically, tubal anastomosis surgery has long been performed by microsurgery through laparotomy, which provided very high precision but was associated with some degree of morbidity. The parallel development of in vitro fertilization and laparoscopy have contributed to reducing the indications for tubal surgery. The laparoscopic approach is challenging because of the number and precision of the sutures needed. The robot-assisted laparoscopic approach may reduce the surgical difficulty and improve the accessibility of this technique. We have described the technique of tubo-tubal reanastomosis after sterilization with robot-assisted laparoscopy in 10 steps. Robot-assisted laparoscopy provides favourable conditions for performing tubo-tubal reanastomosis after sterilization due to the camera stability, precision of movement, and amplitude of articulations.

Microsurgical anastomosis of the fallopian tubes after tubal ligation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Between 20% and 30% of women who have undergone tubal ligation regret their decision. The alternative to regain fertility for these women is either in vitro fertilization or tubal re-anastomosis. This article presents a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the current evidence on the efficacy of tubal recanalization surgery in patients who have previously undergone tubal ligation. STUDY DESIGN: The search was conducted in the World of Science (WOS) database, The Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov record using the keywords "tubal reversal", "tubal reanastomosis" and "tubal anastomosis". The review was carried out by two of the authors. Data from 22 studies were evaluated, comprising over 14,113 patients who underwent the studied surgery, following strict inclusion criteria: articles published between January 2012 and June 2022, in English and with a sample size bigger than 10 patients were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: The overall pregnancy rate after anastomosis was found to be 65.3 % (95 % CI: 61.0-69.6). The percentage of women who had at least one live birth, known as the birth rate, was 42.6 % (95 % CI: 34.9-51.4). Adverse outcomes after surgery were also examined: the observed abortion rate among women who underwent surgery was 9.4 % (95 % CI: 7.0-11.7), and the overall ectopic pregnancy rate was 6.8 % (95 % CI: 4.6-9.0). No differences were found between the outcomes when differentiating surgical approaches: laparotomy, laparoscopy, or robotic-assisted surgery. The patient's age was identified as the most significant determining factor for fertility restoration. Finally, when comparing the results of tubal reversal with in vitro fertilization, reversal procedures appear more favorable for patients over 35 years old, while the results are similar for patients under 35 years old, but more data is needed to evaluate this finding. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the available literature review demonstrates that surgical anastomosis following tubal ligation is a reproducible technique with relevant success rates, performed by multiple expert groups worldwide.

The feasibility of reduced sutures in 3D laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show the technique of reduced sutures in 3D laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis. DESIGN: Step-by-step demonstration of the procedure using video. SETTING: Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal demands high precision and requires both skill and experience. Conventionally, 4 to 6 interrupted patterns using 6-0 to 8-0 absorbable sutures are used for laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis. We used fewer and larger sutures under a magnified 3D view to perform the procedure. INTERVENTIONS: We presented a case of a 42-year-old woman, gravida 3, para 3, who underwent tubal sterilization during Cesarean section 10 years ago. Preoperative hysterosalpingography (HSG) showed bilateral distal tubal occlusion. The procedure started with the subserosal injection of diluted vasopressin in both proximal and distal ends and in the mesosalpinx to facilitate dissection and hemostasis. After transection of tubal stump and removal of scar tissue, we used a 3 Fr ureteral catheter as the stent to facilitate suturing. Three interrupted 4-0 monocryl sutures were used for suturing both tubal mucosal and muscular layers at 6, 2, and 10 o'clock sites. We performed bilateral ampullo-ampullary reanastomosis. The tubes were successfully reanastomosed, and patency was confirmed by chromotubation performed at the end of the procedure (Figure 1). The operation lasted for 71 minutes. The operative blood loss was less than 50 ml. Patent right fallopian tube was confirmed on postoperative HSG 1 month later. The patient had a successful pregnancy 8 months after the operation. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows the feasibility of 3D laparoscopy for tubal reanastomosis using reduced sutures. The technique alleviates the damage to the fallopian tube. The operative time, hospital stay, and postoperative adhesions were significantly lower than the conventional method with a comparable success rate.

Female sterilization reversal in the era of in-vitro fertilization.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Regret after female sterilization is not uncommon in the United States. Prior to the development of assisted reproductive technology (ART), surgical reversal of sterilization was the only option for patients interested in fertility. First performed in 1972, this procedure has since been refined over the years by gynaecologic surgeons. With in-vitro fertilization (IVF) gaining popularity, interest in sterilization reversal has waned. However, sterilization reversal should remain an important option in patients seeking pregnancy after tubal ligation. RECENT FINDINGS: A direct comparison between IVF and sterilization reversal is challenging due to inherent differences in reporting fertility outcomes. However, sterilization reversal may optimize fertility in younger women, whereas IVF may be more effective in older women. The surgical approach to sterilization reversal can be laparotomic, laparoscopic or robotic. Clinical decision making should include consideration of the risk of ectopic pregnancy, interval from sterilization to reversal, type of sterilization procedure, planned anastomotic site and projected remaining tubal length. SUMMARY: In the era of IVF, sterilization reversal still has a place in the management in restoring fertility. Creating awareness of the role of sterilization reversal is the first step in improving access to adequate training in this procedure for the next generation of reproductive surgeons.

Risk of Sterilization Regret and Age: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2015-2019.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of sterilization regret based on age at the time of sterilization in a contemporary group of women. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, Female Respondent Files, to estimate the proportion of women who experience sterilization regret. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the population and the proportion with regret. Sterilization regret was defined as someone who either underwent sterilization reversal or who definitely wanted sterilization reversal. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations with sterilization regret. RESULTS: A total of 1,549 women who underwent sterilization were included in the analysis; 8% were aged 21-30 years, and 92% were aged older than 30 years. Of the participants, 16.9% identified as Black, 22.0% as Hispanic, and 57.2% as White. Most (58.4%) underwent a tubal sterilization procedure between age 21 and 30 years. The cumulative proportion of regret was 10.2% (12.6% for women who underwent sterilization at age 21-30 years and 6.7% for those who underwent sterilization at older than age 30 years). After controlling for covariates including age, race, parity, educational attainment, and medical reason for sterilization, the only variable that had a statistically significant association with regret was age at the time of the interview (P<.001). As women got older, they were less likely to report sterilization regret. CONCLUSION: Younger women experience more sterilization regret. As women get older, sterilization regret decreases. Counseling about sterilization should reveal the unpredictability of future desire, but age alone must not be a barrier to performing sterilization.

Is there any difference between pregnancy results after tubal reanastamosis performed laparotomically, laparoscopically, and robotically?

INTRODUCTION: Tubal reanastamosis offers hope to conceive again. However, there are many factors that affect the success of this procedure. In our study we aimed to compare the pregnancy rates of the surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis in pregnancy requested after tubal sterilization. METHODS: In our study we compared the rates of pregnancies after reanastamosis retrospectively in female patients under the age of 40 who underwent reanastamosis between 2010 and 2019 with laparotomic, laparoscopic and robotic methods. A single layer of 4 quadrant 6/0 number polydioxanone absorbable sutures were used in all surgical methods. A similar surgical technique was used. RESULTS: In surgical methods (laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotics), there was a statistical difference between the three groups in terms of operation times of surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis (p < 0.05). Laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotics pregnancy rates were 52.6% (n = 41), 67.3% (n = 37), 61.2% (n = 63), respectively. There was no statistical difference between groups in terms of pregnancy rates. However, odds ratio (OR) values of the laparoscopy group and robotics group probability of conception were 1.536 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.813-2.898), 1.111 (95% CI, 0.656-1.879) higher, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no statistical difference between the surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis, we think that the laparoscopic surgical method may be preferable due to the shorter hospital stay. We think that the previous method of bilateral tubaligastion (BTL), the site of reanastasis, and the time between BTL and reanastomosis were effective in pregnancy success.

Tips and Techniques for Laparoscopic Tubal Reanastomosis: A Case Report.

Tubal reanastomosis or tubal reversal, a surgical method used to reverse tubal sterilization, may be an option for women who for various reasons wish to reestablish their fertility. A 38-year-old Chinese woman, gravida 2, para 2 (both delivered through cesarean section) presented to our outpatient gynecology clinic requesting bilateral tubal recanalization. After other causes of infertility were excluded, laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis was performed. Here, we present our tips and techniques for laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis that rapidly resulted in an intrauterine pregnancy, which delivered at term. Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis is a well-established procedure with good prognosis, as reported in the literature. For women who wish to become pregnant after tubal sterilization, it is necessary to present the option of surgery as well as in vitro fertilization.

Fallopian tube anatomy predicts pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes after tubal reversal surgery.

We conducted this study to determine whether fallopian tube anatomy can predict the likelihood of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes after tubal sterilization reversal. We built a flexible, non-parametric, multivariate model via generalized additive models to assess the effects of the following tubal parameters observed during tubal reparative surgery: tubal lengths; differences in tubal segment location and diameters at the anastomosis sites; and fibrosis of the tubal muscularis. In this study, population, age, and tubal length-in that order-were the primary factors predicting the likelihood of pregnancy. For pregnancy outcomes, tubal length was the most influential predictor of birth and ectopic pregnancy, while age was the primary predictor of miscarriage. Segment location and diameters contributed slightly to the odds of miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy. Tubal muscularis fibrosis had little apparent effect. This study is the first to show that a statistical learning predictive model based on fallopian tube anatomy can predict pregnancy and pregnancy outcome probabilities after tubal reversal surgery.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: Single institution analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tubal anastomosis has similar pregnancy rates regardless of approach. Historically, robotic anastomosis has been associated with increased cost and operative time. We sought to perform a contemporary study of these metrics. METHODS: One hundred and nine patients were identified who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. Phone survey was conducted. RESULTS: The mean operative time decreased from 140.7 ± 27.0 min in 2013 to 60.0 ± 9.1 min in 2018, with significant downward trend (p < 0.001). The mean cost was $7153.46 ± $1484.41. The pregnancy rate was 59% (35/59), and tubal patency rate was 81% (42/52). Seventy-two percent of patients under 37 years became pregnant. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant improvement in operative time of robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with surgical experience. Robotic tubal anastomosis outperformed historical metrics of laparoscopy and laparotomy with regard to operative time and cost in this series.

Laparoscopic Tubal Re-anastomosis or In Vitro Fertilisation in Previously Ligated Patients: A Comparison of Fertility Outcomes and Survey of Patient Attitudes

INTRODUCTION: We aim to compare live birth rates, cost analysis and a survey of patient attitudes between laparosopic tubal re-anastomosis and in vitro fertilisation (IVF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was done in a single reproductive medicine and IVF unit in Singapore from January 2011 to December 2016. Previously ligated patients underwent either laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis or IVF. The primary outcome was first live birth after treatment. Interval to first pregnancy, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancies were also reported. Patients attending the subfertility clinic completed a questionnaire on IVF and tubal re-anastomosis on preferred choice of treatment, before and after reading an information sheet. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent tubal re-anastomosis while 31 patients underwent IVF treatment. Pregnancy (75.0% vs 35.5%) and live birth (58.3% vs 25.8%) were significantly higher in the tubal surgery group (P <0.05%) after transferring all available embryos in one stimulated IVF cycle. Cost per live birth was lower in the tubal surgery group (SGD27,109 vs SGD52,438). One hundred patients participated in the survey. A majority of patients preferred tubal surgery to IVF (68.2% vs 31.8%) before given information on the procedures, but indicated a preference for IVF (54.6%) to surgery (45.4%) after receiving information on the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: For women less than 40 years of age, desiring fertility after tubal ligation, laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis offers better live birth rates and cost-effectiveness. Patients in Singapore are equivocal as to their preference after education regarding the choices. Thus, laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis remains a viable alternative to IVF treatment.

Laparoscopic Essure® Device Removal by En Bloc Salpingectomy-Cornuectomy with Intraoperative X-Ray Checking: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of Essure® device removal via laparoscopic en bloc salpingectomy-cornuectomy resection (LSC) and the utility of confirmation of complete removal with an intraoperative X-ray of the removed specimen (IX-S). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic hospitals of La Conception, Marseille, and Arnaud-de-Villeneuve, Montpellier, France. PATIENTS: Women who were not seeking future fertility seeking Essure® device removal by salpingectomy, between February 2017 and August 2018. INTERVENTIONS: All women underwent LSC. An IX-S was performed to confirm complete Essure® device removal. In the case of an unsatisfactory IX-S, an intraoperative pelvic X-ray control of the patient (IX-P) was performed. If IX-P diagnosed residual Essure® fragments, an additional resection was performed, and the removed tissue was checked by IX-S. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 72 women, and a total of 140 Essure® devices were removed. The IX-S confirmed complete Essure® device removal in 131 of 140 cases (93.6%) in 63 of 72 women (87.5%). Out of the 9 women with unsatisfactory IX-S, 6 had no residual Essure® fragments at IX-P, and Essure® device removal was considered complete. Three women had a persistent Essure® fragment at IX-P: an additional resection allowed complete removal in 2 cases and resulted in failure in 1 of 140 case (0.7%). There were 2 of 72 women (2.8%) intraoperative complications and 4 of 72 women (5.6%) postoperative grade 1 complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. CONCLUSION: Essure® device removal by LSC appears to be an effective and safe procedure. IX-S is a useful method to evaluate whether the removal of Essure® device is complete during an LSC procedure.

A different time for tubal surgery.

"An object in motion tends to remain in motion along a straight line unless acted upon by an outside force." -Isaac Newton.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Desire for Reversal of Sterilization Among U.S. Women.

Purpose: Racial and ethnic disparities in rates of female sterilization, a prominent method of contraception, have been consistently observed for decades. Such disparities are also evident in subsequent desire for reversal of the procedure. Additional work is needed to better understand these patterns, particularly given the historical context of coercive sterilization patterns in minority and low-income women. Materials and Methods: Two cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth data are pooled (2011-2013 and 2006-2010) and used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for race and ethnicity, controlling for payment method, age at sterilization, number of long-term partners, and other known covariates. Results: After adjusting for other factors, the odds of desire for reversal were 70% higher (OR 1.70, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.26-2.29) in non-Hispanic (NH) Black and 54% (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.14-2.08) in Hispanic women compared to their NH White counterparts. In addition, the likelihood of desire for reversal was substantially increased with lower age at sterilization, a higher number of partners, and lower education. Conclusions: Robust findings of desire for reversal among racial and ethnic minorities, taken together with increased desire for reversal on the basis of specific personal characteristics, merit attention to the possibility that disproportionate outcomes reflect a lack of access to desired contraception and an inability to achieve desired fertility goals in marginalized populations.

A Novel Technique for Essure Reversal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An increasing number of women are seeking removal of the Essure sterilization device due to symptoms including pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding, and allergic reaction. A fraction of these women also desire a future pregnancy and request sterilization reversal at the time of device removal. We present a novel technique for Essure reversal in addition to our experience with three cases. METHODS: Simultaneous laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is used to remove the device followed by laparoscopic reimplantation of the distal fallopian tube to the uterine fundus. A video of our method is included and the outcomes of three patients reported. RESULTS: Three women underwent laparoscopic Essure reversal for device-attributed symptoms and desire to restore fertility between 2017 and 2018. All procedures were uncomplicated with restoration of tubal patency in one or both fallopian tubes on follow-up hysterosalpingogram. Over a period of 4 to 10 months of followup, no pregnancies have been reported. CONCLUSION: Essure reversal is a feasible technique for removing the device and restoring tubal patency; however, more data are needed on pregnancy outcomes following this novel procedure.

Sperm agglutination: Prevalence and contributory factors.

Agglutination is a finding noted in semen analyses (SAs) that often causes confusion as to its significance. While some have attributed agglutination to antisperm antibodies (ASAs), there are other causes as well, such as genital tract infection and ascorbic acid deficiency. Additionally, it is known that patients with ASAs often have risk factors such as a history of scrotal trauma or surgery. Therefore, we sought to determine the prevalence of agglutination in our patient population and correlate it with these risk factors, regardless of the presence/absence of ASAs. A retrospective study was conducted on the SAs of men seen at a single academic Reproductive Center. Of the 1,095 SAs identified, 133 (12.1%) patients experienced agglutination (61.7% scant, 21.8% moderate and 16.5% excessive). Of patients who underwent multiple SAs, 24 (12.2%) showed variability. Furthermore, patients who underwent scrotal surgery carried 3.4 times the risk of agglutination (X2 p < 0.01) and 5.5 times the risk of variability (X2 p < 0.01) as compared to those patients without a history significant for scrotal surgery. Agglutination is a relatively common finding in men presenting to a reproductive clinic with little intrapatient variability. Scrotal surgery confers a higher risk of agglutination and variability.

Robotic Single-Site Tubal Reanastomosis: The Robotic Factor.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the advantages of using robotic assistance in tubal reanastomosis surgery. DESIGN: A narrated instructional video. SETTING: University Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (Canadian Task Force Classification III). PATIENT: A 33-year-old woman, G2P2003, who regretted her prior tubal ligation; she continued to request for a tubal reversal with a desire to conceive in the near future. A single-site approach was decided on when she expressed concern for the cosmetic aftermath of multiport surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Robotic single-site tubal reanastomosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We performed robotic single-site tubal reanastomosis on the patient. We used the energy instruments of the monopolar hook and the bipolar slotted grasper. Entry was performed in the umbilicus, after which an abdominal survey was conducted to determine and locate the blocked fallopian tubes. A cold scissor, to avoid additional damage to the tubes, was used to resect the portion of the right blocked tube, and a neonatal feeding tube was inserted though both sections of the tube to ensure proper alignment during the repair. Additionally, a figure of eight suture was placed in the mesosalpinx to reduce the amount of tension during the tubal reanastomosis. We used 4 interrupted 5-0 PDS sutures, with 2 wristed needle drivers, to establish and precisely align the 2 sections of tube, first in the mucosal layer and then in the serosal layer, to achieve proper retention. Upon successful chromopertubation with methylene blue dye, the process was repeated on the left side. A successful tubal reanastomosis was completed and chromopertubation clearly demonstrated that the tubes were patent. Total operation time was approximately 100 minutes, resulting in a successful surgery. Estimated blood loss was only 20 mL. At 2 months after surgery a fluoroscopic hysterosalpingogram was conducted to verify the patency of the tubes. We concluded that both tubes were patent. CONCLUSIONS: The single-site robotic approach provides a potent and valuable method for tubal reanastomosis, rendering difficult surgical techniques more accessible.

Open epididymal spermatozoa aspiration for obstructive azoospermia.

In men suffering from obstructive azoospermia (OA), surgical sperm retrieval (SR) can be performed for use with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Several techniques of surgical SR exist, with various results. In our facility, we have developed the open epididymal spermatozoa aspiration (OESA) procedure. The aim of this study was to report on the sperm retrieval rate (SRR), reproductive outcome and neonatal outcome of OESA followed by ICSI. In addition, we have investigated possible predictors of successful SR and clinical pregnancy. A total of 231 men who were treated with OESA were included in this retrospective analysis, together with their female partners. We found an overall SRR of 76.6%. Serum FSH was a significant negative predictor of successful SR (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.98; p = 0.021). Overall cumulative pregnancy rate was 50.8%. Higher age (odds ratio 0.90; p < 0.001) and frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer (odds ratio 0.56; p = 0.004) were negatively associated with clinical pregnancy in multivariable analysis. Reproductive and neonatal outcomes did not differ according to obstruction cause. We conclude that OESA is a reliable and safe method for surgical SR in men suffering from OA.

Recuperación de la fertilidad en una paciente estéril,mediante microcirugía de trompa uterina, y la aproximación al ovario contralateral / Fertility recovery in a sterile patient, by means of uterine tube microsurgery, and the approach to the contralateral ovary

Para que ocurra un embarazo exitoso, se requiere la integridad del tracto genital femenino, destacando como elementos importantes las trompas uterinas (TU) que transportan gametos y al óvulo fecundado a la cavidad uterina. La enfermedad de las TU por varias causas, como el embarazo ectópico, constituyen un 20% de causas de infertilidad. Gracias al desarrollo de técnicas de reproducción asistida (TRA) como la fecundación in vitro (FIV), en un alto porcentaje de pacientes que tienen un daño permanente y severo en estas estructuras, la cirugía para reparar o recanalizar las trompas uterinas ha sido desplazada por esta técnica de reproducción asistida. La reanastomosis tubárica tiene una tasa de éxito y de embarazos naturales después de la cirugía del 9% en mujeres con enfermedad tubárica severa al 69% en casos de enfermedad tubárica leve. Se presenta el caso de una paciente joven diagnosticada de infertilidad postquirúrgica por antecedentes de dos embarazos ectópicos accidentados previos que afectaron ambas trompas uterinas y ooforectomía izquierda; luego de realizado el procedimiento microquirúrgico, recuperó la posibilidad de ser madre.

For a successful pregnancy to occur, the integrity of the female genital tract is required, highlighting as important elements the uterine tubes (TU) that transport gametes and the fertilized egg into the uterine cavity. The disease of TU due to several causes, such as ectopic preg- nancy, constitute 20% of infertility causes. Thanks to the development of assisted reproduction techniques (ART) such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), in a high percentage of patients who have permanent and severe damage to these structures, surgery to repair or recanalize the uterine tubes has been displaced by This assisted reproduction technique. Tubal reanastomosis has a success rate and natural pregnancies after surgery of 9% in women with severe tubal disease at 69% in cases of mild tubal disease. We present the case of a young patient diagnosed with post-surgical infertility due to a history of two previous injured ectopic pregnancies that affec- ted both uterine tubes and left oophorectomy; After performing the micro-surgical procedure, he recovered the possibility of being a mother.